An
Ideas Factory?
Looking
back on my working life I find that there is a common thread. I
worked in various roles in IT and businesses but the common thread
seems to be that I was above all paid to think and to think
differently (outside the box). That holds true from my days in
teaching, through the early fundamentals of computing to drawing up
business plans. Thinking originally, differently is what has done it
for me, often borrowing ideas from others that related to other
contexts. So here are some more thoughts along those lines, of
whatever import.
My
balcony is an obvious place to have an aperitif or late night drink
for much of the year. Up one side I have a honeysuckle growing and
over the balcony itself is a jasmine, providing beautiful scent
through the spring and summer. Anybody else might have planted the
same but the way I came to this is as follows. An American
architect, Christopher Alexander, had a significant influence on
software development through his ideas on how to use space and to
define and connect spaces and I was familiar with his ideas. His
prime criterion for how to design within a defined space (my balcony
in this instance) is a dependence on how that space is going to be
used. I have read that he was given the task of designing a
university campus and plotted out the main buildings, halls of
residence, lecture theatres, laboratories, etc, but left the canvas
otherwise blank (grass actually, between the buildings) and said he
would complete that 7-8 months later. When he returned, students had
defined paths between the buildings by tramping grass down and also
defined areas where they congregated in leaisure hours. He simply
endorsed the status quo, creating concrete paths where the students
had shown where they were needed and leaving grass areas with tables
and benches where students congregated. This was not artistic design
but design according to use. Others may well have decided on my
balcony plants by another route but this is how I decided on mine.
Friend
Steve and I often have discussions of a semi-political nature and
recently he said that governments should be care ful not to tax the
rich too luch because then they might decide to migrate and they paid
the most tax. I said no they didn't and Steve, being a friend,
rather than tell me to piss off said something like «well I must
have been misinformed«. It was a misunderstanding. Steve was
talking about the tax individuals paid and I was talking about the
revenue that the Exchequer receives. Leaving aside for the moment tax
avoidance and how much tax rich individuals actually pay, the open
question is what is the importance to the Exchequer of tax paid by
the rich? We're still looking for data on that, to test my
off-the-cuff contention that if all the rich buggered off it wouldn't
make that much difference to the Exchequer.
I had a
follow-up thought. Tax avoidance is obviously a reason many tax
specialists/accountants are hired. So what if all such costs above
some earnings threshold, say £100,000 for an individual and £1m for
a company, were made non tax-deductible? There would obviously be a
bun-fest on cost attribution but could that have a useful impact? I
don't know but it's a thought. My focus on tax currently is,
incidentally, because that is what I believe that Brexit is
fundamentally all about; all the rest is theatre to sidetrack the
plebs.
A final
thought for football fans. Technically gifted players get fouled
constantly. In the last season in the UK Hazard and Saha were the
most fouled players in the Enhllish Premier League. Some of the
fouls are no doubt unintentional but there are fairly obvious
attempts to avod red and yellow cards by spreading the fouls out
between defenders. Referees already keep count of the number of
fouls committed by a player, issuing yellow cards to repeating
defenders. So what if they also kept account of he number of fouls
commited against one player, with a ruling that, for instance, the
fifth foul against one individual automatically incurred a yellow
card irrespective of the player who committed that foul? It might be
unfair to the player committing the foul but would protect
technically gifted players (whom everybody wants to see display their
skills) and would send a message that such players can't be taken out
of a game by fouling them.
Ah
well, just thoughts.