Further Late Night Thoughts From My Balcony Over A Calvados
I have always found
anomalies intriguing because they tell you that something that you
think you know or your reasoning must be wrong. So you have to
rethink. Here’s my latest.
A humanoid skull
dated to 200,000BC and attributed to Devonian man was found some time
ago. Much more recently DNA has been extracted from it and undergone
analysis which proved it identical to current homo sapiens DNA. That
surprised no one since Devonian man has for several years been
presumed to be homo sapiens prime ancestor, with little bits of
Neanderthal and possibly others in the mix. What we don’t and can’t
ever knnow is which bits of the DNA were switched on or off. That
has some significance because we all now carry the DNA to potentially
turn us all into hairy apes, but it is switched off. We don’t know
what got switched on or off or when but what we can quite reasonably
infer is that Devonian man had the same potential as humans today.
Set that aside for
the moment look at the generally agreed picture of human development
after 10,000BC, the end of the last ice age. Hairy cavemen (and
women) and primitive technology come to mind. Recent discoveries,
particularly Gobekli Tepe, have shown that at that time technology in
some places at least was more advanced than previously thought.
Agriculture and farming, understanding of astronomy and ability with
stone carving, for instance, were more advanced albeit still quite
primitive. But…..if the ice age and its cause had wiped out all
previous technology that would be the case (a big assumption,
admittedly). So consider then advances in technology from 10,000BC to
today. They are huge and have been developed over a mere 12,000
years. So, if we are to assume that this is the height of human
technology development to date we must assume that Devonian man, with
the same potential, did nothing with that potential for around
170,000, as against 12,00 years. It’s an equally big assumption.
You can choose which assumption you wish to make but I think you must
make one of them.
The root problem
here is hard evidence, virtually all of which if there was any would
have been wiped out by the last ice age. There is, in fact, more
evidence for technologically very sophisticated societies existing
prior to the last age than there is for only hairy cavemen roaming
the planet (the two could co-exist, of course, as they do in effect
now). But none of the evidence is really hard; it’s anecdotal, the
stuff of myths and legends. Prior to year AD0 there wasn’t one god
but very many different ones who were worshipped all over the globe.
So what then constituted a god? Someone/thing with technological capabilities you couldn’t comprehend? Items discovered embedded in
coal seams, which must be at least 300 million years old (we
currently think), pose further conundrums.It’s all very puzzling
but try imagining a man in a pin-stripe suit and a bowler hat
carrying an umbrella and brief-case 50,000 years ago and see what
that does to your picture of pre-history.