French Character
And The Common Market
I'm not sure why I
keep puzzling over the French character since there is no more a
stereotype that encapsulates France than there is for any other
country. However, in any country there can be character traits that
tend to predominate, possibly as a result of culture, education,
history, institutions or whatever, and it is these that I try to
flush out. I've commented before on the apparent contradiction of an
impulse to bureaucracy and at the same time an impulse to anarchy.
Now I'm wondering about assertiveness.
Some time ago I
related how boules in the village was becoming fraught because of a
woman player who basically was acting like a spoiled child. The
problem has resurfaced this summer. Most of the regular players have
voted with their feet to play in Buis rather than face down the
problem player, despite my urging them to tell her to behave or piss
off. I regard that as a lack of assertiveness on their part. Now
the regular summer visitors are arriving and are frustrated,
disappointed, exasperated and even angry at finding the usual boules
afternoons in the village they were looking forward to don't happen
any more. Why, they ask? But these are the same people who wouldn't
face down the problem player before, the reason for the change. So
can't the French stomach confrontation when it is required? Can't
they be assertive when assertiveness is needed?
I now read in the
Press that French farmers are blockading the frontiers with Spain and
Germany to stop farm goods entering the country which may sell at a
lower price than their local equivalents. These farmers certainly
don't flinch from confrontation; they've been not only stopping but
eviscerating lorries trying to enter France, and doing it with
apparent impunity. In contrast to the farmers, the French police are
showing no assertiveness at all in the face of what are
unquestionably criminal acts. The police are washing their hands of
the whole business.
I asked friend René
about this situation this pizza evening and he replied that it was
because of the different regulations and costs associated with farm
produce between France and other European countries; they needed to
be the same. But they are not and neither are they for just about
any kind of product you can name. So would other countries in the EU
be entitled to blockade their frontiers with the tacit connivance of
the police on the basis of difference in regulation and costs of
production? If so, what price the common market?
This
last was admittedly a pointless question since nobody here, quite
possibly nobody in Europe, believes in a common market other than we
deluded Brits. And I haven't really got any further either in my
investigation of assertiveness; all I can say with any certainty is
that is that it definitely applies to farmers but probably not to
village boules get-togethers.
A
German Europe?
I
read an interesting article suggesting that the relationship between
Germany and Europe had shifted significantly over the Greek crisis.
One of the claimed successes of the EU has been the absence of a war
in Europe (pace
the Balkans) in the last 60 years. What
is certainly true is that major political and diplomatic initiatives
were aimed at integrating Germany closely into Europe, creating a
European Germany. The article I read suggested that the shift was
from a European Germany to a German Europe: Germany had exerted its
financial muscle over the Greek crisis, despite conciliatory
suggestions from France and Italy. Friend René
said he had always assumed this to be the case: that Germany was
destined to be the commercial and financial engine of Europe.
Yet
there is quite a strong case for arguing that Germany should take
something of a financial hit. In 1953 it had all its war reparation
debts written off while receiving significant financial investment
from the USA via the Marshall plan. It also joined the Euro when
indisputably conforming to all the financial requirements when
several other countries didn't, thus placing it in a good financial
position. And it was
allowed to join at an
exchange rate to the mark that was artificially low, strengthening
its financial position further. Germany is undoubtedly the
commercial and financial engine of the EU but it didn't get there
entirely through its own efforts. So it owes. Whether
and how much it will be willing to pay has yet to be seen.
yeezy sneakers
ReplyDeletekobe sneakers
michael kors outlet
authentic jordans
longchamp
chrome hearts
adidas ultra boost
michael kors outlet store
michael kors outlet
kyrie 3 shoes